[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1378391213.11205.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 07:26:53 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Cc: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] bonding: simplify and use RCU
protection for 3ad xmit path
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 15:42 +0200, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> Really?
>
> No. Again - take a look at list_first_or_null_rcu. And its comments.
>
> I'm sorry that I'm acting that negatively... But if that gets accepted -
> I'll have days of nightmares.
>
> Try to understand how RCU works, please, before sending patches using it.
BTW, RCU is really hard, even for experimented kernel developers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists