netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: sctp: fix smatch warning in sctp_send_asconf_del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0DF62EB6-A1DB-46CB-971E-7858FB9D3FB7@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Date:	Sat, 7 Sep 2013 22:21:10 +0200
From:	Michio Honda <micchie@....wide.ad.jp>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sctp: fix smatch warning in sctp_send_asconf_del_ip

I understand, thanks!

Cheers,
- Michio

On Sep 7, 2013, at 10:19 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:

> On 09/07/2013 09:40 PM, Michio Honda wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Sorry for that I didn't respond to that warning.
>> You are right, laddr == NULL && addrcnt == 1 is the indicator of the function called by
>> asconf_mgmt().
>> 
>> Since your patch is actually redundant, I would suggest putting comment on the
>> line of "if ((laddr == NULL) && (addrcnt == 1)) {", and/or on the checking in your patch.
> 
> I think as is is just fine. One can read through the Git log and then see
> the rationale behind a change (which is in most cases even more worth than
> a comment). If this function should ever be called from somewhere else for
> whatever reason, then this comment would already be obsolete.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html