[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7327@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:00:33 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Oliver Neukum" <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Subject: RE: usbnet transmit path problems
> > 4) I read that USB3 has a different scheme for terminating bulk data
> > that is a multiple of the packet size.
> > Does this mean that the pad byte isn't needed for USB3?
> > (Or are USB3 controllers/targets just as buggy?)
>
> We don't have enough examples to tell.
Perhaps there should be a separate flag for USB3?
A device might have issues on USB2, but not USB3!
The flag is target specific - so I presume it isn't
a host/sending problem.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists