netdev - Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: use RCU safe kfree for conntrack extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130911170946.GA2926@linuxace.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:09:47 -0700
From:	Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>
To:	Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: use RCU safe kfree for conntrack extensions

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > Looking at
> > your proposed fix, the NAT extension data should have been cleaned
> > from the bysource list in nf_nat_cleanup_conntrack (via __nf_ct_ext_destroy)
> > before reaching the kfree.  Would you agree?
> 
> It is cleaned from the list but as it is an RCU list, other readers can
> still be holding pointers to it. We have to wait for the RCU grace
> period before we can reuse it.

Agreed - looks like your fix should work.  However, two nits:

1) normally RCU functions have _rcu suffixes.  So nf_ct_ext_free should
become nf_ct_ext_free_rcu.

2) kfree_rcu was not added to the kernel until 3.0.  All of the bug
reports I've been looking into (including the original in netfilter bugzilla
at http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714) have been reported in
2.6.32 or earlier kernels.  So a different fix would need to be backported for
-stable.  For that, we would probably export __nf_ct_ext_free_rcu from
nf_conntrack_extend.c and change the kfree call in nf_ct_ext_free_rcu to
call_rcu(&ct->ext->rcu, __nf_ct_ext_free_rcu). Of course the alternative
is just to use this fix for both old and new kernels for simplicity.

> No, it is a bugreport from our customer. And even that customer
> encountered it only once so far. Which is not very surprising as to
> reproduce it, you have to be (un)lucky twice: first to have someone
> overwrite the area soon enough and second to have someone access the
> area after it is overwritten.

Yes, hitting this seems dependent upon phase of the moon.

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html