[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1378991761.1531.2.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:16:01 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <jg1.han@...sung.com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/52] net: fealnx: remove unnecessary pci_set_drvdata()
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 03:36 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:49:56 +0900
>
> > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:25 PM, David Miller wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:11:01 +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> >> > Would you let know the reason not to add coding style fixes?
> >>
> >> They should be made seperately so that the individual changes
> >> can be reviewed more easily and without unnecessary unrelated
> >> changes mixed in.
> >
> > OK, I see. :-)
> > Thank you for your answer.
> > Then, I will send V2 patch soon.
>
> Please do not submit such a huge patch series in the future.
>
> Anything more than 16 patches at a time is not reasonable and
> overloads reviewer's capacity to look at your changes.
Given that this is the same trivial change applied to many different
drivers, is it really worthwhile to break it up into a patch per driver?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists