netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net] xen-netback: count number required slots for an skb more carefully

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:23:28 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	david.vrabel@...rix.com
Cc:	xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ian.campbell@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] xen-netback: count number required slots for an
 skb more carefully

From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:52:48 +0100

> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
> 
> When a VM is providing an iSCSI target and the LUN is used by the
> backend domain, the generated skbs for direct I/O writes to the disk
> have large, multi-page skb->data but no frags.
> 
> With some lengths and starting offsets, xen_netbk_count_skb_slots()
> would be one short because the simple calculation of
> DIV_ROUND_UP(skb_headlen(), PAGE_SIZE) was not accounting for the
> decisions made by start_new_rx_buffer() which does not guarantee
> responses are fully packed.
 ...
> Fix this by counting the number of required slots more carefully.  In
> xen_netbk_count_skb_slots(), more closely follow the algorithm used by
> xen_netbk_gop_skb() by introducing xen_netbk_count_frag_slots() which
> is the dry-run equivalent of netbk_gop_frag_copy().
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> --
> v2: xen_netbk_* -> xenvif_* to match new style

Thanks for resolving this into a final patch after so much back and
forth :-)

I assume you want this queued up for -stable, and can you check if
there is any non-trivial backporting for earlier kernels?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html