[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1379184479.24408.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:47:59 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hong Zhiguo <honkiko@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, vyasevic@...hat.com,
Hong Zhiguo <zhiguohong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] bridge: fix NULL pointer deref of
br_port_get_rcu
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 22:42 +0800, Hong Zhiguo wrote:
> From: Hong Zhiguo <zhiguohong@...cent.com>
>
> The NULL deref happens when br_handle_frame is called between these
> 2 lines of del_nbp:
> dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_BRIDGE_PORT;
> /* --> br_handle_frame is called at this time */
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(dev);
>
> In br_handle_frame the return of br_port_get_rcu(dev) is dereferenced
> without check but br_port_get_rcu(dev) returns NULL if:
> !(dev->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
>
> Eric Dumazet pointed out the testing of IFF_BRIDGE_PORT is not necessary
> here since we're in rcu_read_lock and we have synchronize_net() in
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister. So remove the testing of IFF_BRIDGE_PORT
> and by the previous patch, make sure br_port_get_rcu is called in
> bridging code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hong Zhiguo <zhiguohong@...cent.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Again this is suitable for net tree.
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists