[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130915062125.GA20185@will>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 14:22:23 +0800
From: ZHAO Gang <gamerh2o@...il.com>
To: gamerh2o@...il.com
Cc: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, mellanox mlx4 Fix compile warnings
hell what!
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 09:14:00AM +0300, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 22:10:19 +0300
> Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > + struct res_cq *uninitialized_var(cq);
> > >
> > > err = cq_res_start_move_to(dev, slave, cqn,
> > > RES_CQ_ALLOCATED, &cq);
>
> I have no objection. However, I don't know if the compiler is being too
> clever here or too stupid. The cq variable is initialized in
> cq_res_start_move_to(), but the compiler is ignoring this -- or maybe
> it is simply not assuming that cq will in fact be
> initialized by the called procedure?
>
> In any event, this change cannot hurt.
>
> -Jack
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists