[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+HUmGij5oFZCDWoXcdmQm+WhZCMr+tQZ600K=ORFx5tRFuSag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:14:31 -0700
From: Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...stanetworks.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] net: Delay default_device_exit_batch until no
devices are unregistering
>
> If you could test this patch perhaps refine it I think we are almost at
> a final point of fixing this.
>
I will.
> Just to be clear my reason for prefering this approach is that because
> it adds no extra wait points (we already wait for the rtnl_lock), the
> logic is unconditional and explicit and not hidden in the loopback
> device's reference count. Which should allow anyone reading the code
> to discover and understand this guarantee. Although a big fat comment
> in default_device_exit_batch that we are guaranteeing we don't allow
> the network namespace to exit while there are still network devices in
> it (or something to that effect) is probably appropriate.
I agree, this approach is cleaner than overloading loopback_dev's
refcount as in my original patch.
I will let you know how my tests go over the next few days.
Thanks,
Francesco
>
> Eric
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists