[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k3igcizo.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:52:27 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, amwang@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, fruggeri@...stanetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net loopback: Set loopback_dev to NULL when freed
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 21:34 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:50:51 -0700
>>
>> > On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 16:52 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> It has recently turned up that we have a number of long standing bugs
>> >> in the network stack cleanup code with use of the loopback device
>> >> after it has been freed that have not turned up because in most cases
>> >> the storage allocated to the loopback device is not reused, when those
>> >> accesses happen.
>> >>
>> >> Set looback_dev to NULL to trigger oopses instead of silent data corrupt
>> >> when we hit this class of bug.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> >> ---
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>
>> I'd like to apply this to 'net', any objections?
>
> No objections from me.
No objects from me I just hadn't seen it as a bug fix, but I guess it
sort of is.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists