netdev - [PATCH v3 net-next 03/27] net: uninline netdev neighbour functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1379378812-18346-4-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:46:28 +0200
From:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	jiri@...nulli.us, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 03/27] net: uninline netdev neighbour functions

They don't give almost any speed/size advantage, however it's really
useful to have them in the backtrace.

CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
---

Notes:
    v2  -> v3:
    No change.
    
    v1  -> v2:
    No changes.
    
    RFC -> v1:
    New patch.

 net/core/dev.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 75eabef..d277081 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4684,25 +4684,25 @@ void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
 	kfree_rcu(adj, rcu);
 }
 
-static inline void __netdev_upper_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
-					     struct net_device *udev)
+static void __netdev_upper_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
+				      struct net_device *udev)
 {
 	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, true, false);
 }
 
-static inline void __netdev_upper_dev_remove_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
+static void __netdev_upper_dev_remove_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
 						struct net_device *udev)
 {
 	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, udev, true, true);
 }
 
-static inline void __netdev_lower_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
-					     struct net_device *ldev)
+static void __netdev_lower_dev_remove(struct net_device *dev,
+				      struct net_device *ldev)
 {
 	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, false, false);
 }
 
-static inline void __netdev_lower_dev_remove_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
+static void __netdev_lower_dev_remove_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
 						struct net_device *ldev)
 {
 	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove(dev, ldev, false, true);
@@ -4727,15 +4727,15 @@ int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(struct net_device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
-					     struct net_device *udev)
+static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
+				      struct net_device *udev)
 {
 	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, false, false);
 }
 
-static inline int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
-						       struct net_device *udev,
-						       bool master)
+static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_link_neighbour(struct net_device *dev,
+						struct net_device *udev,
+						bool master)
 {
 	return __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert_link(dev, udev, master, true);
 }
-- 
1.8.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html