[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <523A15F1.60306@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:06:57 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -net] netpoll: fix NULL pointer dereference in netpoll_cleanup
On 09/18/2013 06:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:12:35 +0200
>
>> @@ -1284,15 +1284,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__netpoll_free_async);
>>
>> void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
>> {
>> - if (!np->dev)
>> - return;
>> -
>> rtnl_lock();
>> + if (!np->dev) {
>> + rtnl_unlock();
>> + return;
>> + }
>> __netpoll_cleanup(np);
>> - rtnl_unlock();
>> -
>> dev_put(np->dev);
>> np->dev = NULL;
>> + rtnl_unlock();
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpoll_cleanup);
>
> I know it seems arbitrary, but please do this like:
>
> lock();
> if (condition) {
> ...
> }
> unlock();
>
> rather than having multiple return/unlock code paths.
>
> This style I am suggesting is easier to audit for locking problems.
>
> Thanks.
>
Got it, I'll edit it and re-post.
Thanks,
Nik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists