[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1379519895.11304.268.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:58:15 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] Don't destroy the netdev until the vif is
shut down
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:37 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:46:08PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > Without this patch, if a frontend cycles through states Closing
> > and Closed (which Windows frontends need to do) then the netdev
> > will be destroyed and requires re-invocation of hotplug scripts
> > to restore state before the frontend can move to Connected. Thus
> > when udev is not in use the backend gets stuck in InitWait.
> >
> > With this patch, the netdev is left alone whilst the backend is
> > still online and is only de-registered and freed just prior to
> > destroying the vif (which is also nicely symmetrical with the
> > netdev allocation and registration being done during probe) so
> > no re-invocation of hotplug scripts is required.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
> > Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
yeah, looks good, thanks.
Paul, did you test this with non-Windows frontends too? and do things
like vif hot(un)plug still work?
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists