[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130920.131403.1652318883820150146.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:14:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ben@...adent.org.uk
Cc: jslaby@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeffm@...e.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, isdn4linux@...pen.de, isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] mISDN: add support for group membership check
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:30:44 +0100
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:21:42PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
>> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:18:02 +0200
>>
>> > Ok, let's leave the hole in there then.
>>
>> Jiri, don't turn this on me.
>>
>> The issue is not whether something needs to be fixed or not, I never
>> said "don't fix this" and therefore I'd like to ask politely that you
>> not make it seem like I have.
>>
>> Rather, I'm saying that the implementation is terrible, sets a bad
>> precendence for fixing similar problems, and therefore not is in
>> a state where we can apply it.
>>
>> So, I'm not saying "don't fix this", I'm saying "fix it properly."
>
> I think Jiri's last suggestion was to add the capability check to
> device renaming (which I think everyone agrees is needed) and not
> to add any group identity checks for any operation.
>
> Isn't that fixing it properly?
I'm saying that using a module parameter for this is a deeper and
even more important problem with this change.
He seems to agree with me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists