[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJNuFbBrYyWufqhDOapS4qYWkvLMi4pk8AnqgD8wXo5RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:53:40 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove all uses of printf's %n
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 13:09 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> Hello.
>
> Tetsuo-san:
>
>> We are discussing about removal of %n support from vsnprintf() at
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/16/52 , and you are using %n in seq_printf().
>
> Well, I'm not using (mere alcohol isn't using, right?)
> but I still have the same question for Al.
>
> Are there any races here?
All the call sites I examined were linear. FWIW, I didn't see any races.
-Kees
>
>> I posted https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2013/9/19/53/1 which introduces
>> seq_setwidth() / seq_pad() which can avoid use of %n in seq_printf().
>
> I still think adding last_len, last_rtn
> is sensible.
>
>
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists