lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130923102533.GI17188@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:55:33 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 43/51] DMA-API: dma: edma.c: no need to
 explicitly initialize DMA masks

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:15:39AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> register_platform_device_full() can setup the DMA mask provided the
> appropriate member is set in struct platform_device_info.  So lets
> make that be the case.  This avoids a direct reference to the DMA
> masks by this driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>

This also brings me question that should we force the driver to use the
dma_set_mask_and_coherent() API or they have below flexiblity too?

~Vinod

> ---
>  drivers/dma/edma.c |    6 ++----
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> index ff50ff4..7f9fe30 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
> @@ -702,11 +702,13 @@ static struct platform_device *pdev0, *pdev1;
>  static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info0 = {
>  	.name = "edma-dma-engine",
>  	.id = 0,
> +	.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
>  };
>  
>  static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info1 = {
>  	.name = "edma-dma-engine",
>  	.id = 1,
> +	.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
>  };


>  
>  static int edma_init(void)
> @@ -720,8 +722,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(pdev0);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> -		pdev0->dev.dma_mask = &pdev0->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> -		pdev0->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (EDMA_CTLRS == 2) {
> @@ -731,8 +731,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
>  			platform_device_unregister(pdev0);
>  			ret = PTR_ERR(pdev1);
>  		}
> -		pdev1->dev.dma_mask = &pdev1->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> -		pdev1->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Alsa-devel mailing list
> Alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ