[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380044075.3165.108.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:34:35 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: Toeplitz library functions
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 10:03 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 09:35 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >
> >> We should really be using rxhash for that anyway, eliminate this
> >> ehashfn. This would entail adding rxhash argument in the various
> >> udp_lookup functions.
> >
> > Nope : Some NICs provide UDP rxhash only using L3 (source IP,
> > destination IP), not L4 (adding source & destination ports)
> >
> Then the NIC won't set l4_rxhash and we'll rehash over 4-tuple when
> skb_get_rxhash is called.
Yes, but then in this case you add cpu cycles for no reason.
If you have multiqueue NIC, you do not use RPS/RFS, so skb->rxhash might
be 0
hash = inet_ehashfn(net, daddr, hnum, saddr, sport);
is faster than the whole flow dissection game.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists