[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5242B259.2080603@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:52:25 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 4/6] bonding: add rtnl lock for bonding_store_xmit_hash
the bonding_store_xmit_hash() could update bond's xmit_policy, and
the xmit_policy is used in xmit path for xor mode, maybe it is hard
to occur any problem, but just follow the logic "don't change anything
slave-related without rtnl", so I think the rntl lock is fit here. :)
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
index 0f539de..deb1d8e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
@@ -382,6 +382,9 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_xmit_hash(struct device *d,
int new_value, ret = count;
struct bonding *bond = to_bond(d);
+ if (!rtnl_trylock())
+ return restart_syscall();
+
new_value = bond_parse_parm(buf, xmit_hashtype_tbl);
if (new_value < 0) {
pr_err("%s: Ignoring invalid xmit hash policy value %.*s.\n",
@@ -396,6 +399,7 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_xmit_hash(struct device *d,
xmit_hashtype_tbl[new_value].modename, new_value);
}
+ rtnl_unlock();
return ret;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR(xmit_hash_policy, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists