[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000001ceba51$f8b45c10$ea1d1430$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:47:26 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Wei Yongjun' <weiyj.lk@...il.com>,
'Jonas Jensen' <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, grant.likely@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, 'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
'Sachin Kamat' <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] moxa: drop free_irq of devm_request_irq allocated irq
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 4:33 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>
> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
>
> irq allocated with devm_request_irq should not be freed using
> free_irq, because doing so causes a dangling pointer, and a
> subsequent double free.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/moxa/moxart_ether.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/moxa/moxart_ether.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/moxa/moxart_ether.c
> index 83c2091..9a7fcb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/moxa/moxart_ether.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/moxa/moxart_ether.c
> @@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct net_device *ndev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> unregister_netdev(ndev);
> - free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev);
> moxart_mac_free_memory(ndev);
> free_netdev(ndev);
CC'ed Sachin Kamat,
In this case, the free_irq() will be called, after calling
free_netdev(). 'ndev' is freed by free_netdev(). Then, 'ndev->irq'
is used by free_irq(). Is it right?
In my humble opinion, it seems to make the problem.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists