[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130926201252.GA32748@mhcomputing.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:12:52 -0700
From: Matthew Hall <mh@...omputing.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per-PID network stats files in /proc
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 02:22:39PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 02:04:35PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > You could do what you want by putting each process in own network
> > namespace, but that might be more work than you want to bother with.
>
> Putting my one process or group of processes into one namespace, separate from
> the one the rest of the system uses, could be perfectly OK actually.
>
> So I'm going to look into this and see if it's possible. At least it would
> give me a better route than where I am right now.
>
> Thanks!
> Matthew.
Hi Stephen,
I took a look at this possibility and it seems very powerful but not so easy
to use. Is there a way to make a netns that's like a "child node" of another
netns, and inherits all the settings of the default one, unless I configured
separate settings for this "child netns"? Otherwise the netns has to duplicate
everything already configured on the host system even if it's unchanged from
the standard settings.
Thanks,
Matthew.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists