netdev - Re: [PATCH 7/7] sysfs: @name comes before @ns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130926223259.GA29433@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:32:59 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kay@...y.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	lizefan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] sysfs: @name comes before @ns

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:49:43PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Eric.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:39:27PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > @ns is more significant so it should come first.
> > 
> > Where do we have the backwards convention of putting @name first?
> 
> Because @ns is optional and you end up with stupid stuff like
> 
> 	sysfs_xxx_ns(@param, @ns, @name)
> 	sysfs_xxx(@param, @name)
> 
> You put optional params after the mandatory ones.  It may be difficult
> to accept for you but @ns is a *clearly* optional thing for sysfs.

Sorry Eric, but I agree with Tejun here, the optional part is @ns, not
name, so it should go at the end.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html