[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7362@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:39:00 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...hat.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: rx_dropped count for USB ethernet interfaces
> From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:32:24 +0100
>
> > It isn't exactly useful behaviour though.
>
> In your opinion.
>
> We have tracepoints for people who want more fine grained drops
> in these kinds of situations.
>
> Also, the behavior of this statistic has existed for more than a
> decade so changing it is really not in the cards. Therefore any
> discussion about what would have been the best samentic to choose from
> the beginning is moot.
I suspect that not many people have networks with broadcast packets
for non-IP protocols - so don't ever see rx_dropped being incremented
because there wasn't a protocol stack looking for the packet.
A similar problem will arise if promiscuous mode is enabled
by someone who only wants a specific protocol - eg a specific
ethertype or a single LLC SAP value.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists