[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130927122108.GF6247@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:21:08 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Tom Tucker <tom@....us>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about map_read_chunks()
I have looked at this again, and I still worry that it looks like a bug.
(remote security related blah blah blah).
regards,
dan carpenter
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:50:19PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I had a couple questions about some map_read_chunks().
>
> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
>
> 150 ch_bytes = ntohl(ch->rc_target.rs_length);
> ^^^^^^^^
> It look like this is 32 bits from the network?
>
> 151 head->arg.head[0] = rqstp->rq_arg.head[0];
> 152 head->arg.tail[0] = rqstp->rq_arg.tail[0];
> 153 head->arg.pages = &head->pages[head->count];
> 154 head->hdr_count = head->count; /* save count of hdr pages */
> 155 head->arg.page_base = 0;
> 156 head->arg.page_len = ch_bytes;
> 157 head->arg.len = rqstp->rq_arg.len + ch_bytes;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Can overflow.
> 158 head->arg.buflen = rqstp->rq_arg.buflen + ch_bytes;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Same. I didn't follow it through to see if an overflow matters. Does
> it?
>
> 159 head->count++;
> 160 chl_map->ch[0].start = 0;
> 161 while (byte_count) {
> 162 rpl_map->sge[sge_no].iov_base =
> 163 page_address(rqstp->rq_arg.pages[page_no]) + page_off;
> 164 sge_bytes = min_t(int, PAGE_SIZE-page_off, ch_bytes);
> ^^^
> This is the wrong cast to use. A large ch_bytes would be counted as a
> negative value and get around the cap here.
>
> 165 rpl_map->sge[sge_no].iov_len = sge_bytes;
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists