[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B7365@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:50:12 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Veaceslav Falico" <vfalico@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <nikolay@...hat.com>, <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"Jay Vosburgh" <fubar@...ibm.com>,
"Andy Gospodarek" <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/9] bonding: remove __get_first_port()
> @@ -2104,8 +2091,11 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>
> // check if agg_select_timer timer after initialize is timed out
> if (BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer && !(--BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer)) {
> + slave = bond_first_slave(bond);
> + port = slave ? &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port) : NULL;
> +
> // select the active aggregator for the bond
> - if ((port = __get_first_port(bond))) {
> + if (port) {
> if (!port->slave) {
> pr_warning("%s: Warning: bond's first port is uninitialized\n",
> bond->dev->name);
> --
Looks like that could be:
slave = bond_first_slave(bond);
if (slave) {
port = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port;
and I assume 'slave == port->slave' so there is no need for the latter check?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists