lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1309300604310.26838@mail.embedromix.ro>
Date:	Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:05:45 +0300 (EEST)
From:	catab@...edromix.ro
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	hannes@...essinduktion.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] IPv6 NAT: Do not drop DNATed 6to4/6rd packets

On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, David Miller wrote:

> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:36:06 +0200
>
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:04:19PM +0300, Catalin(ux) M. BOIE wrote:
>>> When a router is doing  DNAT for 6to4/6rd packets the latest anti-spoofing
>>> patch (218774dc) will drop them because the IPv6 address embedded
>>> does not match the IPv4 destination. This patch will allow them to
>>> pass by testing if we have an address that matches on 6to4/6rd interface.
>>> I have been hit by this problem using Fedora and IPV6TO4_IPV4ADDR.
>>> Also, log the dropped packets (with rate limit).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Catalin(ux) M. BOIE <catab@...edromix.ro>
>>
>> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
>
> Applied, but Catalin please strictly refer to changes in the following
> precise format:
>
> 	commit $SHA1_ID ("Commit message header line text")
>
> Because SHA1_IDs are ambiguous, especially when the change in question
> is backported into various -stable branches.
>
> The only way to resolve the ambiguity is to provide the commit message
> text (in parenthesis and double quotes).

Roger.
Should I resubmit it?
Should I send it also to 'stable'?
Thank you.

--
Catalin(ux) M. BOIE
http://kernel.embedromix.ro/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ