lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 30 Sep 2013 06:05:45 +0300 (EEST)
To:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] IPv6 NAT: Do not drop DNATed 6to4/6rd packets

On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, David Miller wrote:

> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <>
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:36:06 +0200
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:04:19PM +0300, Catalin(ux) M. BOIE wrote:
>>> When a router is doing  DNAT for 6to4/6rd packets the latest anti-spoofing
>>> patch (218774dc) will drop them because the IPv6 address embedded
>>> does not match the IPv4 destination. This patch will allow them to
>>> pass by testing if we have an address that matches on 6to4/6rd interface.
>>> I have been hit by this problem using Fedora and IPV6TO4_IPV4ADDR.
>>> Also, log the dropped packets (with rate limit).
>>> Signed-off-by: Catalin(ux) M. BOIE <>
>> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <>
> Applied, but Catalin please strictly refer to changes in the following
> precise format:
> 	commit $SHA1_ID ("Commit message header line text")
> Because SHA1_IDs are ambiguous, especially when the change in question
> is backported into various -stable branches.
> The only way to resolve the ambiguity is to provide the commit message
> text (in parenthesis and double quotes).

Should I resubmit it?
Should I send it also to 'stable'?
Thank you.

Catalin(ux) M. BOIE
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists