[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_0OrwTo7CkuauRpu_ohQRY80U6BJDXQ6=KC0caOFiFCQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 07:46:31 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, jg1.han@...sung.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
wfp5p@...ginia.edu, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ll_temac: Reset dma descriptors on ndo_open
Hello David
lp->tx_bd_ci, lp->tx_bd_next... are only initialized to zero on
temac_of_probe (inside alloc_etherdev). Those vars are used to index
the dma descriptors.
The initialization of lp->tx_bd_v[i].app0 = 0; is redundant, because
it is already done on dma_zalloc_coherent in temac_dma_bd_init called
on open.
What if I move
lp->tx_bd_ci = 0;
lp->tx_bd_next = 0;
lp->tx_bd_tail = 0;
lp->rx_bd_ci = 0;
to temac_dma_bd_init? Will this be more correct?
Without this patch a script like these kills the card in 1-10 iterations:
ifdown eth0
ifdown eth1
while true
do
ifconfig eth1 10.100.10.100
udhcpc -i eth0
ping 192.168.2.1 -c 5 || break
ifconfig eth0 down
ifconfig eth0 10.100.10.100
udhcpc -i eth1
ping 192.168.2.1 -c 5 || break
ifconfig eth1 down
done
Regards
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:21 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:24:28 +0200
>
>> The dma descriptors are only initialized on the probe function.
>>
>> If a packet is on the buffer when temac_stop is called, the dma
>> descriptors can be left on a incorrect status where no other package can
>> be sent.
>>
>> So an interface could be left in an usable state after ifdow/ifup.
>>
>> This patch makes sure that the descriptors are in a proper status when
>> the device is started.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
>
> This analysis is not correct.
>
> In the current driver, the descriptors are allocated and initialized
> in the open function, not the probe function.
>
> I'm not applying this patch.
--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists