netdev - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: udp packets following an UFO enqueued packet need also be handled by UFO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131001123214.GI10771@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date:	Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:32:14 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
	jmorris@...ei.org, kaber@...sh.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: udp packets following an UFO enqueued packet need also be handled by UFO

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:09:07PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:58:37PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> What if non-ufo-path-created skb is peeked?
> > >
> > >You mean like:
> > >first append a frame < mtu
> > >second frame > mtu so it gets handles by ip6_ufo_append?
> > >
> > >Currently I don't see a problem with it but I may be wrong. What is
> > >your suspicion?
> > 
> > Well the skb will have gso_size==0 and ip_summed==CHECKSUM_NONE
> > Because of that it will be not threated as ufo skb.
> > 
> > Following patch fixes it:
> > 
> > Subject: [patch net] ip6_output: do skb ufo init for peeked non ufo skb as well
> > 
> > Now, if user application does:
> > sendto len<mtu flag MSG_MORE
> > sendto len>mtu flag 0
> > The skb is not treated as fragmented one because it is not initialized
> > that way. So move the initialization to fix this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> 
> My understanding is that the frame is only a valid gso frame iff the first skb
> queued up is setup as an UFO frame. In other cases we only need to make sure
> we append to the fragment list without updating the gso field and the skb will
> get linearized (if needed) later in the output path.
> 
> This seems not to matter for virtio_net and loopback because we seem to pass
> the skb as is. But the remaining ethernet card which sets NETIF_F_UFO is
> neterion and we have to verify if this assumption is correct, there.

Hm, ip_append_page seems to violate my assumption. I need to read up on the
code later today.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html