[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131002004057.GE5483@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 09:40:57 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Cc: "dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Ben Pfaff <blp@...ira.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Ravi K <rkerur@...il.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@...inux.co.jp>,
Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.41 5/5] datapath: Add basic MPLS support to kernel
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:02:17PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
> > index d961e5d..bfab9ec 100644
> > --- a/datapath/actions.c
> > +++ b/datapath/actions.c
> > +/* Push MPLS after the ethernet header. */
> > +static int push_mpls(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + const struct ovs_action_push_mpls *mpls)
> [...]
> > + hdr = eth_hdr(skb);
> > + hdr->h_proto = mpls->mpls_ethertype;
> > + if (!eth_p_mpls(skb->protocol) && !ovs_skb_get_inner_protocol(skb))
> > + ovs_skb_set_inner_protocol(skb, skb->protocol);
>
> Do we actually need the check for !eth_p_mpls(skb->protocol)? It's not
> clear to me what condition it is trying to prevent.
True, it does not seem useful.
I will remove it.
> > +static int pop_mpls(struct sk_buff *skb, const __be16 ethertype)
> > +{
> > + struct ethhdr *hdr;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = make_writable(skb, skb->mac_len + MPLS_HLEN);
> > + if (unlikely(err))
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(skb->len < skb->mac_len + MPLS_HLEN))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> I'm not sure that this is the right error code in this situation -
> maybe -EINVAL would be better.
I was a bit unsure what was an appropriate value but
I agree that -EINVAL seems better than -ENOMEM.
I will change it to -EINVAL.
>
> > @@ -545,6 +662,14 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > output_userspace(dp, skb, a);
> > break;
> >
> > + case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PUSH_MPLS:
> > + err = push_mpls(skb, nla_data(a));
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS:
> > + err = pop_mpls(skb, nla_get_be16(a));
> > + break;
>
> I think we need something similar to POP_VLAN here - in the event of
> an error the skb will have already been freed.
Thanks, though I think you mean that PUSH_MPLS should be similar to
PUSH_VLAN. I don't think that either pop_mpls() or pop_vlan() free the
skb on error.
I will add the following:
diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
index bfab9ec..8babfc4 100644
--- a/datapath/actions.c
+++ b/datapath/actions.c
@@ -664,6 +664,8 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PUSH_MPLS:
err = push_mpls(skb, nla_data(a));
+ if (unlikely(err)) /* skb already freed. */
+ return err;
break;
case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_MPLS:
>
> > diff --git a/datapath/datapath.h b/datapath/datapath.h
> > index 4a49a7d..31fe10a 100644
> > --- a/datapath/datapath.h
> > +++ b/datapath/datapath.h
> > @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ struct datapath {
> > * @pkt_key: The flow information extracted from the packet. Must be nonnull.
> > * @tun_key: Key for the tunnel that encapsulated this packet. NULL if the
> > * packet is not being tunneled.
> > + * @inner_protocol: Provides a substitute for the skb->inner_protocol field on
> > + * kernels before 3.11.
> > */
> > struct ovs_skb_cb {
> > struct sw_flow *flow;
>
> I think this comment no longer applies now that inner_protocol has
> been moved into the GSO struct.
Thanks, I'll clean that up.
> > diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c b/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c
> > index 32f906c..f917356 100644
> > --- a/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c
> > +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/gso.c
> > int rpl_dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > #undef dev_queue_xmit
> > int err = -ENOMEM;
> > + __be16 inner_protocol;
> > + bool vlan, mpls;
> >
> > - if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb) && !dev_supports_vlan_tx(skb->dev)) {
> > + vlan = mpls = false;
> > +
> > + inner_protocol = ovs_skb_get_inner_protocol(skb);
>
> I don't think this is actually used in this function.
Thanks, I guess that is the by-product of some refactoring.
I'll remove it.
> Pravin, do you have any further comments?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists