[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380725830.19002.100.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:57:10 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] tcp: shrink tcp6_timewait_sock by one cache
line
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 13:08 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > - tmo = tw->tw_ttd - jiffies;
> > + tmo = tw->tw_ttd - (u32)jiffies;
>
> Do you need any of these (u32) casts?
> The compiler will almost certainly use 32bit arithmetic (on 32bit systems at least)
> because the 'as if' rule lets if use the smaller type.
I wanted to clearly show the intent of the code.
Some compilers might warnings here.
>
> > + tw->tw_ttd = (u32)(jiffies + (slot << INET_TWDR_RECYCLE_TICK));
>
> If that (u32) cast is needed in order to avoid 64bit maths, it is in the wrong place.
I want to make sure no compiler will complain for potential losses of
precision.
Note we have :
include/net/tcp.h:691:#define tcp_time_stamp ((__u32)(jiffies))
But this could change if we want 100us resolution for TCP timestamps at
one point.
In this code, we want HZ units, but truncated to 32bits.
Adding a
#define jiffies32 ((u32)jiffies)
might do the trick, but lot of pain for such a trivial patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists