netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/2] sit: allow to use rtnl ops on fb tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:06:24 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
	pshelar@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] sit: allow to use rtnl ops on fb tunnel

Le 02/10/2013 23:08, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:36:02 +0200
>
>> Le 02/10/2013 09:15, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
>>> Le 01/10/2013 18:59, David Miller a écrit :
>>>> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>>>> Date: Tue,  1 Oct 2013 18:04:59 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> rtnl ops where introduced by ba3e3f50a0e5 ("sit: advertise tunnel
>>>>> param via
>>>>> rtnl"), but I forget to assign rtnl ops to fb tunnels.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that it is done, we must remove the explicit call to
>>>>> unregister_netdevice_queue(), because the fallback tunnel is added to
>>>>> the queue
>>>>> in sit_destroy_tunnels() when checking rtnl_link_ops of all netdevices
>>>>> (this
>>>>> is valid since commit 5e6700b3bf98 ("sit: add support of x-netns")).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
>>>>
>>>> Applied and queued up for -stable.
>> Another things about ipip: between 0974658da47c ("ipip: advertise
>> tunnel param
>> via rtnl", v3.8) and fd58156e456d ("IPIP: Use ip-tunneling code.",
>> v3.10) the
>> fb device of ipip module has the same problem.
>> Should I send a patch?
>
> Yes please do, thanks for noticing this.
>
In fact, I just notice that 3.9 branch is EoL (bug is only in 3.8 and 3.9).
Should I still send a patch ? If yes, based on which tree/branch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html