[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1380823595.19002.220.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 11:06:35 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, tomk@...advisors.com,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next 2/3] udp: Add udp early demux
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 12:39 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:38:52PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > I suggested that for unicast, you do a limited lookup to the first
> > socket found in bucket.
> >
> > If its an exact match, you take the socket.
> >
> > If not, you give up, and do not scan the whole chain.
>
> So something like the following?
>
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 02185a5..d202e5b 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1849,7 +1849,42 @@ begin:
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return result;
> +}
>
> +/* For unicast we should only early demux connected sockets or we can
> + * break forwarding setups. The chains here can be long so only check
> + * if the first socket is an exact match and if not move on.
> + */
> +static struct sock *__udp4_lib_demux_lookup(struct net *net,
> + __be16 loc_port, __be32 loc_addr,
> + __be16 rmt_port, __be32 rmt_addr,
> + int dif)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk, *result;
> + struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
> + unsigned short hnum = ntohs(loc_port);
> + unsigned int slot = udp_hashfn(net, hnum, udp_table.mask);
> + struct udp_hslot *hslot = &udp_table.hash[slot];
> + const int exact_match = 18;
> + int score;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + result = NULL;
> + sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, node, &hslot->head) {
> + score = compute_score(sk, net, rmt_addr, hnum, rmt_port,
> + loc_addr, loc_port, dif);
> + if (score == exact_match)
> + result = sk;
> + /* Only check first socket in chain */
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (result) {
> + if (unlikely(!atomic_inc_not_zero_hint(&result->sk_refcnt, 2)))
> + result = NULL;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return result;
> }
>
Just do the tuple comparison instead of compute_score(),
since you know we want full L4 match.
The standard way is to use the INET_MATCH() macro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists