[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131004162133.GG29572@nicira.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 09:21:33 -0700
From: Ben Pfaff <blp@...ira.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: dev@...nvswitch.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Ravi K <rkerur@...il.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@...inux.co.jp>,
Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.42 1/5] odp: Allow VLAN actions after MPLS actions
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:09:56PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> From: Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
>
> OpenFlow 1.1 and 1.2, and 1.3 differ in their handling of MPLS actions in the
> presence of VLAN tags. To allow correct behaviour to be committed in
> each situation, this patch adds a second round of VLAN tag action
> handling to commit_odp_actions(), which occurs after MPLS actions. This
> is implemented with a new field in 'struct xlate_in' called 'vlan_tci'.
>
> When an push_mpls action is composed, the flow's current VLAN state is
> stored into xin->vlan_tci, and flow->vlan_tci is set to 0 (pop_vlan). If
> a VLAN tag is present, it is stripped; if not, then there is no change.
> Any later modifications to the VLAN state is written to xin->vlan_tci.
> When committing the actions, flow->vlan_tci is used before MPLS actions,
> and xin->vlan_tci is used afterwards. This retains the current datapath
> behaviour, but allows VLAN actions to be applied in a more flexible
> manner.
>
> Both before and after this patch MPLS LSEs are pushed onto a packet after
> any VLAN tags that may be present. This is the behaviour described in
> OpenFlow 1.1 and 1.2. OpenFlow 1.3 specifies that MPLS LSEs should be
> pushed onto a packet before any VLAN tags that are present. Support
> for this will be added by a subsequent patch that makes use of
> the infrastructure added by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
I noticed a couple more minor points.
First, it seems to me that the "vlan_tci" member that this adds to
xlate_in could go in xlate_ctx just as well. I would prefer that,
because (as far as I can tell) there is no reason for the client to use
any value other than flow->vlan_tci here, and putting it in xlate_ctx
hides it from the client.
Thanks for rearranging the code and updating the comment in
do_xlate_actions(). It makes the operation clearer. But now that it's
clear I have an additional question. Does it really make sense to have
'vlan_tci' as only a local variable in do_xlate_actions()? Presumably,
MPLS and VLANs should interact the same way regardless of whether they
are separated by resubmits or goto_tables. That is, I suspect that this
is xlate_ctx state, not local state.
Thanks,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists