netdev - Re: [PATCH] 6lowpan: Sync default hardware address of lowpan links to their wpan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131006002451.GA22623@omega>
Date:	Sun, 6 Oct 2013 02:24:52 +0200
From:	Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To:	Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>
Cc:	Alexander Smirnov <alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 6lowpan: Sync default hardware address of lowpan links
 to their wpan

Hi Alan,

On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 05:38:00PM -0400, Alan Ott wrote:
> When a lowpan link to a wpan device is created, set the hardware address
> of the lowpan link to that of the wpan device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@...nal11.us>
> ---
>  net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c
> index c85e71e..fb89133 100644
> --- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c
> +++ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c
> @@ -1386,6 +1386,9 @@ static int lowpan_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
>  
>  	entry->ldev = dev;
>  
> +	BUG_ON(IEEE802154_ADDR_LEN != dev->addr_len);
So if somebody make a:
"ip link add link $NOT_8BYTE_HWADDR_DEV name $NAME type lowpan"

the kernel creates a BUG_ON? Okay it seems that case is very unusual but
better is to return a errno so "maybe(I don't know it)" the userspace
software will generate a error and the whole kernel doesn't crash.

> +	memcpy(dev->dev_addr, real_dev->dev_addr, IEEE802154_ADDR_LEN);
Is there one case where we read the dev->dev_addr? I saw a case when we
set this [1], but I don't know why we need this. Did you detect some
problems because this isn't the "real" hw addr?

Other case is I am feeling uneasy when we have two netdev devices with
the same hw addr.

- Alex

[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/ieee802154/6lowpan.c?id=refs/tags/v3.12-rc3#n1102
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html