[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d2ngvgxb.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 15:45:36 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: fruggeri@...stanetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Separate the close_list and the unreg_list v2
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 19:26:05 -0700
>
>>
>> Separate the unreg_list and the close_list in dev_close_many preventing
>> dev_close_many from permuting the unreg_list. The permutations of the
>> unreg_list have resulted in cases where the loopback device is accessed
>> it has been freed in code such as dst_ifdown. Resulting in subtle memory
>> corruption.
>>
>> This is the second bug from sharing the storage between the close_list
>> and the unreg_list. The issues that crop up with sharing are
>> apparently too subtle to show up in normal testing or usage, so let's
>> forget about being clever and use two separate lists.
>>
>> v2: Make all callers pass in a close_list to dev_close_many
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Sending the complete diff because this version is actually more
>> readable and more obviously correct.
>
> I'll apply this, thanks Eric.
Thanks. It is good to see this getting sorted out.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists