netdev - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: fix xenvif_count_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD0129E7A@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
Date:	Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:23:56 +0000
From:	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC:	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Annie Li <annie.li@...cle.com>, Matt Wilson <msw@...zon.com>,
	Xi Xiong <xixiong@...zon.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: fix
	xenvif_count_skb_slots()

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Vrabel
> Sent: 07 October 2013 10:50
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Wei Liu; Ian Campbell;
> Annie Li; Matt Wilson; Xi Xiong
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: fix
> xenvif_count_skb_slots()
> 
> On 04/10/13 17:26, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > Commit 4f0581d25827d5e864bcf07b05d73d0d12a20a5c introduced an error
> into
> > xenvif_count_skb_slots() for skbs with a linear area spanning a page
> > boundary. The alignment of skb->data needs to be taken into account, not
> > just the head length. This patch fixes the issue by dry-running the code
> > from xenvif_gop_skb() (and adjusting the comment above the function to
> note
> > that).
> 
> If 4f0581d2582 is causing the skb->data to be fully packed into a
> minimal number of slots then the simple
> DIV_ROUND_UP(skb_headlen(skb))
> is correct.
> 
> I think this change will miscount in the number of slots,
> over-estimating the count which I think will eventually cause netback to
> think the ring has no space when it has some.
> 
> Is the problem here not the miscounting of slots but running out of
> space in the grant table op array because we know use more copy ops?
> 

Essentially yes. Netback is built on the assumption of no more than two grant copies per ring slot.

> I didn't think there was any real merit in the problematic commit (or at
> least there was no evidence that it was better) so I would suggest just
> reverting it instead of trying to fix it up.
> 

I'd be happy with a reversion.

> If we do want to change how netback fills the ring then netback needs
> some redesign (i.e., change it so it doesn't have to this counting in
> advance) to make it much less fragile to changes in this area.
> 

Yes, that would be much better.

  Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html