[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQynJVvFesFYp68N5kzCJJD3-NXPZUUMfkg8m=or4eaLzMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:05:51 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: dormando <dormando@...ia.net>,
Michele Baldessari <michele@...syn.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 kernel warning
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com> wrote:
> I suspect tcp_process_tlp_ack() should not revert state to Open
> directly, but calling tcp_try_keep_open() instead, similar to all the
> undo processing in the tcp_fastretrans_alert(): after
> tcp_end_cwnd_reduction(), the process (E) falls back to check other
> stats before moving to CA_Open.
>
>
> index 9c62257..9012b42 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -3314,7 +3314,7 @@ static void tcp_process_tlp_ack(struct sock *sk, u32 ack,
> tcp_init_cwnd_reduction(sk, true);
> tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_CWR);
> tcp_end_cwnd_reduction(sk);
> - tcp_set_ca_state(sk, TCP_CA_Open);
> + tcp_try_keep_open(sk);
> NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk),
> LINUX_MIB_TCPLOSSPROBERECOVERY);
> }
Yes, nice catch! This looks good to me. My testing confirms that this
definitely fixes a bug when this code fires and there are segments
SACKed out. Since it will stay in CA_Disorder if there are outstanding
retransmissions, I bet it will also fix the WARN_ON(tp->retrans_out !=
0) in state TCP_CA_Open that people are seeing.
neal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists