[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131009225716.GI11709@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:57:16 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
linux-decnet-user@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 05/13] decnet: Apply rcu_access_pointer()
to avoid sparse false positive
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:46:04PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 03:28:42PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 02:29:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > >
> > > The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded
> > > to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu,
> > > which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the use in
> > > dn_insert_route() is legitimate: It is assigning a pointer to an element
> >
> > Nit: "uses ... are", not "use ... is". :)
>
> Don't I already have "use ... is"?
I was suggesting that it needed to change from "use ... is" to "uses ...
are", not the other way around.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists