lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9_=nCdBjCgkwX1QHjNvLdXZ+5jxPDV_+XHqhG8dAo1fK=tVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:38:17 +0900
From:	Nguyen Hong Ky <nh-ky@...so.co.jp>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Ryusuke Sakato <ryusuke.sakato.bx@...esas.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sh_eth: Fix RX packets errors on R8A7740

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 01:28:26PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:29:25PM +0900, Nguyen Hong Ky wrote:
>> > This patch will fix RX packets errors when receiving big size
>> > of data by set bit RNC = 1.
>> >
>> > RNC - Receive Enable Control
>> >
>> > 0: Upon completion of reception of one frame, the E-DMAC writes
>> > the receive status to the descriptor and clears the RR bit in
>> > EDRRR to 0.
>> >
>> > 1: Upon completion of reception of one frame, the E-DMAC writes
>> > (writes back) the receive status to the descriptor. In addition,
>> > the E-DMAC reads the next descriptor and prepares for reception
>> > of the next frame.
>> >
>> > In addition, for get more stable when receiving packets, I set
>> > maximum size for the transmit/receive FIFO and inserts padding
>> > in receive data.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Nguyen Hong Ky <nh-ky@...so.co.jp>
>>
>> I realise that this patch has been applied but regardless
>> I would like to acknowledge that it resolve a problem that
>> I observed this afternoon.
>>
>> Without this patch I see the following on the console, many times:
>>
>> net eth0: Receive FIFO Overflow
>>
>> With this patch I do not see the warning message at all.
>
> Scratch that, I am still seeing the messages with this patch applied.
>

Would you please confirm that it was patched in below function:

static struct sh_eth_cpu_data r8a7740_data = {...}

Thanks for your help,
Nguyen Hong Ky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ