[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1381316730.4971.16.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 04:05:30 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: François Cachereul <f.cachereul@...halink.fr>
Cc: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG in net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 12:11 +0200, François Cachereul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got the following BUG when using l2tp modules with smp kernel.
> I noticed that l2tp_xmit_skb uses bh_lock_sock/bh_unlok_sock which
> doesn't seem to be correct because it does a lot of stuff and probably
> sleep before releasing the lock. I try replacing
> bh_lock_sock/bh_unlock_sock with lock_sock/release_sock and the BUG
> doesn't happened anymore. Is it correct ?
>
> Regards
> François
>
At first glance, you might read commit
6af88da14ee284aaad6e4326da09a89191ab6165
("l2tp: Fix locking in l2tp_core.c")
l2tp_eth_dev_xmit() is called from BH context, so you cannot use
lock_sock()
Try the following patch instead :
diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
index f0a7ada..ffda81e 100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c
@@ -353,7 +353,9 @@ static int pppol2tp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct msgh
goto error_put_sess_tun;
}
+ local_bh_disable();
l2tp_xmit_skb(session, skb, session->hdr_len);
+ local_bh_enable();
sock_put(ps->tunnel_sock);
sock_put(sk);
@@ -422,7 +424,9 @@ static int pppol2tp_xmit(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
skb->data[0] = ppph[0];
skb->data[1] = ppph[1];
+ local_bh_disable();
l2tp_xmit_skb(session, skb, session->hdr_len);
+ local_bh_enable();
sock_put(sk_tun);
sock_put(sk);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists