netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 00/77] Re-design MSI/MSI-X interrupts enablement pattern

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:41:09 +0200
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	Mark Lord <kernel@...rt.ca>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Andy King <acking@...are.com>, Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux390@...ibm.com,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, iss_storagedev@...com,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-driver@...gic.com,
	Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
	"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/77] Re-design MSI/MSI-X interrupts enablement
 pattern

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:17:18PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> Just to help us all understand "the loop" issue..
> 
> Here's an example of driver code which uses the existing MSI-X interfaces,
> for a device which can work with either 16, 8, 4, 2, or 1 MSI-X interrupt.
> This is from a new driver I'm working on right now:
> 
> 
> static int xx_alloc_msix_irqs (struct xx_dev *dev, int nvec)
> {
>         xx_disable_all_irqs(dev);
>         do {
>                 if (nvec < 2)
>                         xx_prep_for_1_msix_vector(dev);
>                 else if (nvec < 4)
>                         xx_prep_for_2_msix_vectors(dev);
>                 else if (nvec < 8)
>                         xx_prep_for_4_msix_vectors(dev);
>                 else if (nvec < 16)
>                         xx_prep_for_8_msix_vectors(dev);
>                 else
>                         xx_prep_for_16_msix_vectors(dev);
>                 nvec = pci_enable_msix(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, dev->num_vectors);
>         } while (nvec > 0);
> 
>         if (nvec) {
>                 kerr(dev->name, "pci_enable_msix() failed, err=%d", nvec);
>                 dev->num_vectors = 0;
>                 return nvec;
>         }
>         return 0;       /* success */
> }

Yeah, that is a very good example.

I would move all xx_prep_for_<pow2>_msix_vector() functions to a single
helper i.e. xx_prep_msix_vectors(dev, ndev).

Considering also (a) we do not want to waste unused platform resources
associated with MSI-Xs and pull more quota than needed and (b) fixing
couple of bugs, this function could look like this:

static int xx_alloc_msix_irqs(struct xx_dev *dev, int nvec_in)
{
	int nvec = roundup_pow_of_two(nvec_in);	/* assume 0 > nvec_in <= 16 */
	int rc;

	xx_disable_all_irqs(dev);

retry:
       	xx_prep_for_msix_vectors(dev, nvec);

	rc = pci_enable_msix(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, nvec);	/* (b) */
	if (rc > 0) {
		nvec = rounddown_pow_of_two(nvec);		/* (a) */
		goto retry;
	}

	if (rc) {
		kerr(dev->name, "pci_enable_msix() failed, err=%d", rc);
		dev->num_vectors = 0;
		return rc;
	}

	dev->num_vectors = nvec;				/* (b) */
	return 0;       /* success */
}

Now, this is a loop-free alternative:

static int xx_alloc_msix_irqs(struct xx_dev *dev, int nvec)
{
	nvec = roundup_pow_of_two(nvec);	/* assume 0 > nvec <= 16 */

	xx_disable_all_irqs(dev);

	pci_lock_msi(dev->pdev);

	rc = pci_get_msix_limit(dev->pdev, nvec);
	if (rc < 0)
		goto err;

	nvec = min(nvec, rc);		/* if limit is more than requested */
	nvec = rounddown_pow_of_two(nvec);	/* (a) */

	xx_prep_for_msix_vectors(dev, nvec);

	rc = pci_enable_msix(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, nvec);	/* (b)	*/
	if (rc < 0)
		goto err;

	pci_unlock_msi(dev->pdev);

	dev->num_vectors = nvec;		/* (b) */
	return 0;

err:
	pci_unlock_msi(dev->pdev);

        kerr(dev->name, "pci_enable_msix() failed, err=%d", rc);
        dev->num_vectors = 0;
        return rc;
}

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html