[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131011100943.GE15556@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:09:43 +0100
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
CC: <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] xen-netback: add support for IPv6
checksum offload from guest
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:25:30PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
[...]
> -#define PKT_PROT_LEN (ETH_HLEN + \
> - VLAN_HLEN + \
> - sizeof(struct iphdr) + MAX_IPOPTLEN + \
> - sizeof(struct tcphdr) + MAX_TCP_OPTION_SPACE)
> +#define PKT_PROT_LEN 128
I'm not against changing this, but could you please add comment on why
128 is chosen.
>
[...]
> + while ((off <= sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + ntohs(ipv6h->payload_len)) &&
> + !done) {
> + switch (nexthdr) {
> + case IPPROTO_FRAGMENT: {
> + struct frag_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off);
> +
> + header_size = skb->network_header +
> + off +
> + sizeof(struct frag_hdr);
> + maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> +
> + nexthdr = hp->nexthdr;
> + off += 8;
Can you use sizeof(frag_hdr) instead of 8?
> + break;
> + }
> + case IPPROTO_DSTOPTS:
> + case IPPROTO_HOPOPTS:
> + case IPPROTO_ROUTING: {
> + struct ipv6_opt_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off);
> +
> + header_size = skb->network_header +
> + off +
> + sizeof(struct ipv6_opt_hdr);
> + maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> +
> + nexthdr = hp->nexthdr;
> + off += ipv6_optlen(hp);
> + break;
> + }
> + case IPPROTO_AH: {
> + struct ip_auth_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off);
> +
> + header_size = skb->network_header +
> + off +
> + sizeof(struct ip_auth_hdr);
> + maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> +
> + nexthdr = hp->nexthdr;
> + off += (hp->hdrlen+2)<<2;
> + break;
> + }
> + case IPPROTO_TCP:
> + case IPPROTO_UDP:
> + found = true;
> + /* Fall through */
> + default:
> + done = true;
> + break;
The above 'switch' doesn't seem to cover all IPPROTO_*. Will it cause
the loop to exit too early? In other words, does any IPPROTO_* not
listed above marks the end of parsing?
[...]
> unsigned long now = jiffies;
> @@ -1428,12 +1598,7 @@ static int xenvif_tx_submit(struct xenvif *vif, int budget)
>
> xenvif_fill_frags(vif, skb);
>
> - /*
> - * If the initial fragment was < PKT_PROT_LEN then
> - * pull through some bytes from the other fragments to
> - * increase the linear region to PKT_PROT_LEN bytes.
> - */
> - if (skb_headlen(skb) < PKT_PROT_LEN && skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> + if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb) && skb_headlen(skb) < PKT_PROT_LEN) {
This change is not necessary: the comment is useful, and swapping two
operands of && doesn't have any effect.
Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists