netdev - Re: Peak TCP performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJoZ4U0tpKhknMLd7kN4uQmq-E81=EbH1Q816nX_eig=tGreAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:33:28 -0400
From:	Kyle Hubert <khubert@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Peak TCP performance

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 22:34 -0400, Kyle Hubert wrote:
>> I'm working on a device, I consistently get 27gbps via netperf-2.6.
>> UDP reports 54gbps.
>>
>> TCP is maxed out at 100% CPU on the transmit side. On the receive
>> side, 40% of the CPU. Thus, I didn't believe I could eek anymore
>> performance out of it.
>>
>> However, very oddly, if I enabled bridged mode to forward some
>> packets, TCP performance goes up to 32gbps. The thing that bothers me
>> is that transmit CPU utilization drops to 65%, and receive CPU
>> utilization increases to 60%.
>>
>> What happens when the device becomes bridged to gain so much
>> performance? Also, can I now take advantage of the extra CPU time
>> available to drive more traffic? No tunable seems to have any effect..
>> (except down)
>
>
> You do not give what version of linux you use, but my guess is that
> using latest trees should help, because of
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=c9eeec26e32e087359160406f96e0949b3cc6f10
>
> Also try to disable tx-nocache-copy
>
> ethtool -K eth0 tx-nocache-copy off

Ah, yes, sorry. I'm on 3.0.80 (SLES SP2). And, no, I do not have that
commit. In fact, the code looks quite different. There must have been
a lot of changes?

Also, my copy of ethtool does not recognize tx-nocache-copy. However,
I do have control over the net device. Is there something there I can
set, or is tx-nocache-copy also a new feature? I'll start digging.

Thanks for your response.
-Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html