[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1381636737.3392.29.camel@edumazet-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:58:57 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: baker.kernel@...il.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fib_trie: remove duplicated rcu lock
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 08:13 +0800, baker.kernel@...il.com wrote:
> From: "baker.zhang" <baker.kernel@...il.com>
>
> fib_table_lookup has included the rcu lock protection.
>
> Signed-off-by: baker.zhang <baker.kernel@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> index b3f627a..0e9127d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> @@ -170,12 +170,10 @@ static inline unsigned int __inet_dev_addr_type(struct net *net,
> local_table = fib_get_table(net, RT_TABLE_LOCAL);
> if (local_table) {
> ret = RTN_UNICAST;
> - rcu_read_lock();
> if (!fib_table_lookup(local_table, &fl4, &res, FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF)) {
> if (!dev || dev == res.fi->fib_dev)
> ret = res.type;
> }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> }
This looks very wrong.
res.fi could disappear, and we crash.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists