[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131014222010.GB3873@neomailbox.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:20:10 +0200
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...hcoding.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net] bridge: clean the nf_bridge status when forwarding the
skb
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:32:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> > > > > index 4b81b14..65864bc 100644
> > > > > --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> > > > > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> > > > > br_drop_fake_rtable(skb);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* clean the NF bridge data */
> > > > > + nf_bridge_put(skb->nf_bridge);
> > > > > + skb->nf_bridge = NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Regarding CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER you are right, thanks.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I think the header will also be garbage if bridge on bridge with netfilter is used.
> > > > See nf_bridge_save_header.
> > >
> > > What header are you referring to? nf_bridge_save_header() saves the header in
> > > skb->nf_bridge->data, which is freed during nf_bridge_put() (assuming
> > > ->use reached 0).
> > >
> > >
> >
> > If bridge is stacked the original ether header will get overwritten by the second
> > call to save_header.
>
> Sorry, but I am not getting what you mean (I am new to the code and it is late here..):
> save_header() will store the Ethernet header in nf_bridge->data for
> later recover (if needed).
>
> By freeing nf_bridge I also destroy this header copy.
>
> When the skb enters the second bridge, save_header() will save again the header
> in nf_bridge->data. But I don't see how this can create a problem.
>
> The problem I had before this patch comes from the fact that
> nf_bridge_copy_header() is invoked in the second bridge with the nf_bridge state
> of the first. This was overwriting my the packet Ethernet header with what the
> first invocation of save_header() stored in nf_bridge->data.
>
> But by unsetting nf_bridge I think I am preventing this from happening again.
> no?
Hello Stephen,
do you have other comments about this patch? I know it is rather difficult that
a generic user hits this issue, but I'd like to see it fixed because other
people using batman-adv may incur in this problem.
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists