netdev - Re: [PATCH -next] netdev: inet_timewait_sock.h missing semi-colon when KMEMCHECK is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:53:57 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] netdev: inet_timewait_sock.h missing semi-colon
 when KMEMCHECK is enabled

On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 12:36 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> 
> Fix (a few hundred) build errors due to missing semi-colon when
> KMEMCHECK is enabled:
> 
>   include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h:139:2: error: expected ',', ';' or '}' before 'int'
>   include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h:148:28: error: 'const struct inet_timewait_sock' has no member named 'tw_death_node'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> ---
>  include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- next-2013-1014.orig/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> +++ next-2013-1014/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ struct inet_timewait_sock {
>  				tw_transparent  : 1,
>  				tw_pad		: 6,	/* 6 bits hole */
>  				tw_tos		: 8,
> -				tw_pad2		: 16 /* 16 bits hole */
> +				tw_pad2		: 16;	/* 16 bits hole */
>  	kmemcheck_bitfield_end(flags);
>  	u32			tw_ttd;
>  	struct inet_bind_bucket	*tw_tb;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Shouldn't this be done in kmemcheck.h?

 include/linux/kmemcheck.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
index 39f8453..b9ffad5 100644
--- a/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
+++ b/include/linux/kmemcheck.h
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ bool kmemcheck_is_obj_initialized(unsigned long addr, size_t size);
  *     kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(a, flags);
  */
 #define kmemcheck_bitfield_begin(name)	\
-	int name##_begin[0];
+	int name##_begin[0]
 
 #define kmemcheck_bitfield_end(name)	\
-	int name##_end[0];
+	int name##_end[0]
 
 #define kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(ptr, name)				\
 	do {								\


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html