[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525CAC21.5040202@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:44:49 +0800
From: jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@...cle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit
On 2013-10-14 19:19, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 04:53:18PM +0800, jianhai luan wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>> I meet the DomU's network interface hung issue recently, and have
>> been working on the issue from that time. I find that DomU's network
>> interface, which send lesser package, will hung if Dom0 running
>> 32bit and DomU's up-time is very long. I think that one jiffies
>> overflow bug exist in the function tx_credit_exceeded().
>> I know the inline function time_after_eq(a,b) will process jiffies
>> overflow, but the function have one limit a should little that (b +
>> MAX_SIGNAL_LONG). If a large than the value, time_after_eq will
>> return false. The MAX_SINGNAL_LONG should be 0x7fffffff at 32-bit
>> machine.
>> If DomU's network interface send lesser package (<0.5k/s if
>> jiffies=250 and credit_bytes=ULONG_MAX), jiffies will beyond out
>> (credit_timeout.expires + MAX_SIGNAL_LONG) and time_after_eq(now,
>> next_credit) will failure (should be true). So one timer which will
>> not be trigger in short time, and later process will be aborted when
>> timer_pending(&vif->credit_timeout) is true. The result will be
>> DomU's network interface will be hung in long time (> 40days).
>> Please think about the below scenario:
>> Condition:
>> Dom0 running 32-bit and HZ = 1000
>> vif->credit_timeout->expire = 0xffffffff, vif->remaining_credit
>> = 0xffffffff, vif->credit_usec=0 jiffies=0
>> vif receive lesser package (DomU send lesser package). If the
>> value is litter than 2K/s, consume 4G(0xffffffff) will need 582.55
>> hours. jiffies will large than 0x7ffffff. we guess jiffies =
>> 0x800000ff, time_after_eq(0x800000ff, 0xffffffff) will failure, and
>> one time which expire is 0xfffffff will be pended into system. So
>> the interface will hung until jiffies recount 0xffffffff (that will
>> need very long time).
> If I'm not mistaken you meant time_after_eq(now, next_credit) in
> netback. How does next_credit become 0xffffffff?
I only assume the value is 0xfffffff, and the value of next_credit
isn't point. If the delta between now and next_credit larger than
ULONG_MAX, time_after_eq will do wrong judge.
>
> Wei.
>
>> If some error exist in above explain, please help me point it out.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists