[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131015205510.GA18442@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:55:10 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: prevent ipcomp scratch buffer race condition
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:33:48AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
> > index 2906d52..96946fb 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
> > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
> > @@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ static int ipcomp_decompress(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > const int cpu = get_cpu();
> > u8 *scratch = *per_cpu_ptr(ipcomp_scratches, cpu);
> > struct crypto_comp *tfm = *per_cpu_ptr(ipcd->tfms, cpu);
> > - int err = crypto_comp_decompress(tfm, start, plen, scratch, &dlen);
> > + int err;
> > int len;
> >
> > + local_bh_disable();
>
> Maybe we could disable the BHs before we fetch the percpu pointers.
> Then we can use smp_processor_id() to get the cpu. With that we
> could get rid of a (now useless) preempt_disable()/preempt_enable()
> pair. Same could be done in ipcomp_compress().
Sounds like a good idea. I'll send v2 after some basic testing.
Michal Kubecek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists