lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131015083348.GW7660@secunet.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:33:48 +0200
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: prevent ipcomp scratch buffer race condition

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 06:03:34PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> In ipcomp_compress(), sortirq is enabled too early, allowing the
> per-cpu scratch buffer to be rewritten by ipcomp_decompress()
> (called on the same CPU in softirq context) between populating
> the buffer and copying the compressed data to the skb.
> 
> Add similar protection into ipcomp_decompress() as it can be
> called from process context as well (even if such scenario seems
> a bit artificial).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> ---
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
> index 2906d52..96946fb 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_ipcomp.c
> @@ -48,9 +48,11 @@ static int ipcomp_decompress(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	const int cpu = get_cpu();
>  	u8 *scratch = *per_cpu_ptr(ipcomp_scratches, cpu);
>  	struct crypto_comp *tfm = *per_cpu_ptr(ipcd->tfms, cpu);
> -	int err = crypto_comp_decompress(tfm, start, plen, scratch, &dlen);
> +	int err;
>  	int len;
>  
> +	local_bh_disable();

Maybe we could disable the BHs before we fetch the percpu pointers.
Then we can use smp_processor_id() to get the cpu. With that we
could get rid of a (now useless) preempt_disable()/preempt_enable()
pair. Same could be done in ipcomp_compress().

Looks ok otherwise. Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ