[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525D513B.70406@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:29:15 +0800
From: jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@...cle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ANNIE LI <annie.li@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit
On 2013-10-15 20:58, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:26:31PM +0800, jianhai luan wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> Can you propose a patch?
>>>> Because credit_timeout.expire always after jiffies, i judge the
>>>> value over the range of time_after_eq() by time_before(now,
>>>> vif->credit_timeout.expires). please check the patch.
>>> I don't think this really fix the issue for you. You still have chance
>>> that now wraps around and falls between expires and next_credit. In that
>>> case it's stalled again.
>> if time_before(now, vif->credit_timeout.expires) is true, time wrap
>> and do operation. Otherwise time_before(now,
>> vif->credit_timeout.expires) isn't true, now -
>> vif->credit_timeout.expires should be letter than ULONG_MAX/2.
>> Because next_credit large than vif->credit_timeout.expires
>> (next_crdit = vif->credit_timeout.expires +
>> msecs_to_jiffies(vif->credit_usec/1000)), the delta between now and
>> next_credit should be in range of time_after_eq(). So
>> time_after_eq() do correctly judge.
>>
> Not sure I understand you. Consider "now" is placed like this:
>
> expires now next_credit
> ----time increases this direction--->
>
> * time_after_eq(now, next_credit) -> false
> * time_before(now, expires) -> false
If now is placed in above environment, the result will be correct
(Sending package will be not allowed until next_credit).
* time_after_eq(now, next_credit) --> false will include two environment:
expires now next_credit
-----------time increases this direction ---->
Or
expires next_credit next_credit + MAX_LONG/2 now
-----------time increases this direction ---->
the first environment should be correct to control transmit. the second
environment is our included environment.
Jason
>
> Then it's stuck again. You're merely narrowing the window, not fixing
> the real problem.
>
> Wei.
>
>> Jason
>>> Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists