netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 16 (net/sched/em

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <525F09B0.4080802@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Oct 2013 14:48:32 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 16 (net/sched/em_ipset.c)

On 10/16/13 11:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the
> repository below:
> 
>         git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git
> 
> A next-20131016 tag is also provided for convenience.
> 
> Gained two new conflicts, but nothing too exciting. x86 and ARM default
> configurations as well as the x86 allmodconfig mostly build fine on the
> final tree. There was a failure for the ARM at91x40_defconfig, but the
> proper fix wasn't immediately obvious to me, so I've left it broken for
> now.

on i386, when CONFIG_NET_NS is not enabled:

net/sched/em_ipset.c: In function 'em_ipset_change':
net/sched/em_ipset.c:27:36: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nd_net'
net/sched/em_ipset.c: In function 'em_ipset_destroy':
net/sched/em_ipset.c:49:34: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nd_net'


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html